No. 23-6468

Omar A. Rahman v. Pennsylvania

Lower Court: Pennsylvania
Docketed: 2024-01-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure due-process evidence pennsylvania-superior-court right-to-counsel right-to-defense search-and-seizure suppression-of-evidence unlawful-arrest witness-testimony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision conflicts with the decisions of the United States Court of Appeals and other Pennsylvania Superior Court decisions?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ' Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision, affirming the denial of Petitioner's suppression of physical evidence claim, conflicts with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals and other Pennsylvania Superior Court ‘decisions? Suggested Answer: Yes. Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision, tacitly affirming the denial of Petitioner's unlawful arrest claim, "conflicts with the decisions of the United States Court of Appeals and other Pennsylvania Superior Court decisions? Suggested. Answer: Yes. : , Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision, . affirming the denial of Petitioner's right to call witnesses in his defense and to present evidence material to his defense, conflicts with the decisions of the United States Court of , Appeals and other Pennsylvania Superior Court decisions? Suggested Answer: Yes.

Docket Entries

2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-08
Waiver of right of respondent Pennsylvania to respond filed.
2020-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Omar A. Rahman
Omar A. Rahman — Petitioner
Pennsylvania
Nancy WinkelmanDistrict Attorney's Office, Respondent