Whether the South Circuit Court of Appeals and the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia have jurisdiction to hear and decide the Petitioner's Habeas Corpus Petition, where the federal sentencing court's decision from another Circuit was contrary to clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court

Questions presented... we. a — . OY. TS Qeurs.c. section 2255 Unconstitutional (f fhe 2 _.. Pelitioner Was Subjected to Gny Substantial —— dhad made his cemedy under Section. 9458_ less. Sun€t and... _ . imperative than a federal habeas. Corpus. Po ..D. -Does the Soucth Cirevit Couck of Appeals and. the Districh . Courck foc Mne eastern’ District of Virginia have jorisdietion to. ___. hea and decide the Petitioners Habeas Corpus Petition, where. . Sedeca\ Sentencing Couck's decision, fron another. Circirk, Was. Contrary . 40,00 inVelved an Unteasonoble application of Clearly established. .__.. Gedesad Law, as determined by the Supreme Court,.and where it od. will be Colile Sox trum ko Jp eing, MS Vokd Constitotional Vialodion 2 2 Claims backto life wah dhe Oisirich Court Cac the Dishrich of Webrasha and the €ight Crcevik Couck of Appeals, where the petitioner. chel not... Keceng & Galland Gar heasing , thereby. Kendering IT.US.C Section DAS snadeguale or cnelFecdivedo test the. legality of his_Conurction?. , . .B) Does . 9855 (2) inadequode. o¢ incKeckive mean thal ikisa sek of 2. CASES Am Whroin. Moe Gebbbiones Cammok Utilize 3995, and in Which the . 9. Caluce to .aow foc Collakerol Ceview Would Taise Secsovs Consiodional _Gpeskions ?. ee eee _.@) |