No. 23-6471
Edward J. Steiner v. Brent Kempster, et al.
IFP
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in striking the motions as untimely, which are important to the case involving video evidence and tampering issues that impact the rights of U.S. citizens
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; Oates of jurisdiction, | , Otte motions stricken in dig trict court are very impor fant fo the case, All video clothing etc, 1§ itel tothe case, . one thiscase andothets (keit before the Caurts — be for the Jood of US CitiZenS . | G Video tampering» D shald v5CS Rd Rules Bid RI0\ be iorced,
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2023-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2024)