Whether the district court violated the Defendant's Due Process and Confrontation rights by excluding video evidence

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW i. In this case alleging sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, whether the district court violated the Defendant’s Due Process and Confrontation rights by excluding video wherein the victim had consensual sex with the Defendant and made statements consenting to prostitution (including that having a pimp was the “perfect situation” for her because she “likeld] to be controlled and told what to do”). i. Whether the Government engaged in prosecutorial misconduct and deprived the Defendant of a fair trial by asking the Defendant over 80 times on crossexamination whether he had heard the testimony of other witnesses, thus prompting him to comment on their credibility.