No. 23-6476

Phillip Thomas Green v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: advisory-guidelines appellate-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing presumption-of-reasonableness rebuttal sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What is required of defendants to provide a genuine rebuttal of the presumption of reasonableness for federal sentences under due process?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question for Review With the understanding that federal sentences are accompanied by a presumption of reasonableness if they fall within a properly calculated advisory guidelines range, what is required of defendants to provide a genuine rebuttal of this presumption under due process? 1

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Phillip Green
Joseph Oren McAfeeMcAfee & McAfee, PLLC, Petitioner
Joseph Oren McAfeeMcAfee & McAfee, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent