No. 23-6476
Phillip Thomas Green v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: advisory-guidelines appellate-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing presumption-of-reasonableness rebuttal sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is required of defendants to provide a genuine rebuttal of the presumption of reasonableness for federal sentences under due process?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question for Review With the understanding that federal sentences are accompanied by a presumption of reasonableness if they fall within a properly calculated advisory guidelines range, what is required of defendants to provide a genuine rebuttal of this presumption under due process? 1
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-08
Attorneys
Phillip Green
Joseph Oren McAfee — McAfee & McAfee, PLLC, Petitioner
Joseph Oren McAfee — McAfee & McAfee, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent