No. 23-6492
Delondo Henderson v. United States
Tags: complicity complicity-law controlled-substances criminal-law inchoate-offense inchoate-offenses sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation u.s.s.g.-4b1.2
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the State of Kentucky's complicity law state an inchoate offense, such that a conviction for complicity cannot constitute a 'controlled substances offense' pursuant to the definition provided in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the State of Kentucky’s complicity law state an inchoate offense, such that a conviction for complicity cannot constitute a “controlled substances offense” pursuant to the definition provided in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2? il RELATED CASES Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 14(1)(b)Gii), Petitioner submits the following cases which are directly related to this Petition: none iil
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 16, 2024)
Attorneys
Delondo Henderson
Kevin Michael Schad — Office of the Federal Public Defender , Petitioner
Kevin Michael Schad — Office of the Federal Public Defender , Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent