No. 23-6502
Marwan Lamar Lamb v. United States
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process judicial-finding preponderance-of-evidence preponderance-of-the-evidence sentencing-guidelines trial-by-jury
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does nearly doubling a defendant's Guidelines sentence range based on a judge's finding by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed another crime violate the defendant's Constitutional rights to due process of law and trial by jury?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does nearly doubling a defendant’s Guidelines sentence range based on a judge’s finding by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed another crime violate the defendant’s Constitutional rights to due process of law and trial by jury? 1 STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 16, 2024)
Attorneys
Marwan Lamar Lamb
Kenneth Tableman — Kenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Petitioner
Kenneth Tableman — Kenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent