No. 23-6503

David Rivera v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process free-speech fundamental-rights pretrial-claims prosecutorial-discretion prosecutorial-vindictiveness standing
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When a defendant presents strong circumstantial evidence of possible vindictiveness beyond mere correlation, can a presumption of vindictiveness arise pretrial?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW When a defendant presents strong circumstantial evidence of possible vindictiveness beyond mere correlation, can a presumption of vindictiveness arise pretrial? prefix PARTIES,

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-01-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 16, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixAppendix

Attorneys

David Rivera
Katie Hurrelbrink — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent