No. 23-6520
Gary Von Bennett v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: commerce-clause congressional-power federal-authority federal-criminal-law firearm-regulation firearms-regulation interstate-commerce scarborough-v-united-states statutory-interpretation united-states-v-lopez
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) requires a more substantial connection to interstate commerce
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) should be construed to require a more substantial connection to interstate commerce than the mere passage of a firearm across state lines in an unspecified way, and if not, whether it exceeds Congress’s power to enact? i
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 21, 2024)
Attorneys
Gary Von Bennett
Stephanie Eileen Inman — The Law Office of Stephanie Inman, Petitioner
Stephanie Eileen Inman — The Law Office of Stephanie Inman, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent