Whether Defense Counsel Jessica McAfee Performance Was Ineffective Assistance Under Strickland v. Washington

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : (1) Whether Defense Counsel Jessica McAfee Performance Was Ineffective Assistance Under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. : 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)? (2) Whether the District Court Error When Calculating Mr. Norton's base-offense level at thirty-two (32). By Attributing to Mr. Norton A drug quantity of at least 150 grams, but less than 500 grams? (3) Whether The Government had a Duty to file an Enhancement’ Notice, Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §851, before Norton's Trial? (4) Whether The Sale or Delivery of three grams of Crack-Cocaine qualified as serious drug offenses for the purpose of an Armed Career Criminal Enhancement? (5) Whether The District Court Error When Enhancing Mr. Norton's Sentence two-levels for obstruction of Justice U.S.S.G. §3C1.1. (6) Whether The District Court Error In Enhancing Mr. Norton's Sentence two-levels Pursuant to U.S.S.G. §2k2.1(b)(6) Use of a firearm in connection with another felony offense? ~i