No. 23-6525

Michael Dukes v. E.M.S.A. HSA Stephanie Wood, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure court-proceedings due-process evidence extraordinary-circumstances judicial-procedure legal-standard material-evidence obstruction obstruction-of-justice standing
Key Terms:
Punishment
Latest Conference: 2024-02-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does obstruction preventing dispositive material evidence from being presented in court constitute 'extraordinary circumstances'?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DOES OBSTRUCTION PREVENTING DISPOSITIVE . MATERIAL EVIDENCE FROM BEING PRESENTED IN COURT CONSTITUTE ‘EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES’? Answered in the Negative by the lower court.

Docket Entries

2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-02-01
Waiver of right of respondent RACHEL MEDLOCK, HSA to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent Stephanie Wood to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Michael Dukes
Michael Dukes — Petitioner
Michael Dukes — Petitioner
RACHEL MEDLOCK, HSA
Alexander R. Ferrante — Gold & Ferrante, PC, Respondent
Alexander R. Ferrante — Gold & Ferrante, PC, Respondent
Stephanie Wood, et al.
Anthony Thomas Kovalchick — Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Respondent
Anthony Thomas Kovalchick — Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Respondent