Whether the district court erred in finding that Brown is a career offender under U.S.S.G. §§4B1.1 and 4B1.2, where one of Brown's predicate convictions only required a mens rea of recklessness at the time of commission and thus did not qualify as a 'crime of violence' pursuant to Borden v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1817 (2021), and where the district court judge specifically stated that he almost certainly would have chosen a lower sentence if the career offender designation did not apply

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the Aisrcick Cour erced ir Ficding, that Brown IS OQ Career Offender Vader US.S.G UBL and UBI.2., where one Of Boown's Predicate convictions only | FeQuired A MENS CeA Of cecklessness OF the relevant time Of COMMITHON ANd tus did NOX Qualify as a Seeime of violence’ Pursuant +o Borden vu. Gaited Stoves IWS. Gt. ITCZ2021) and lhece the Aistcice Court Judge Specifically stoked tho Ne almmos* certainly would Nove Clnosenr a lower semtence if the career offender designacion does aot apply). —