Whether the state court's disregard of a Officer of the Court Reliance on FRAUD to Justify A Discriminatory Jury Strike Contradicts the Holding of the United States Supreme Court in Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. V. Hartford Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 245-247 (1944)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) Whether the state court’s disregard of a Officer of the Court Reliance on FRAUD to Justify A Discriminatory Jury Strike Contradicts the Holding of the United States Supreme Court in Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. V. Hartford Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 245-247 (1944) (2) Whether, State prosecution’s race neutral explanation for striking black female juror deprived Petitioner of liberty and equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U.S. 103, 79 L.Ed. 791 (1935) 2