No. 23-6535
Ryan C. Armstrong v. United States Federal Government, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: capital-case civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-government judicial-circuit law-enforcement mental-health standing state-government state-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Copyright
SocialSecurity Copyright
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
capital-case
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I am not presenting my case to the Supreme Court with a question. My case is being presented to the Supreme Court as a matter of right. My case is a capital case. :
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States Federal Government, et al. to respond filed.
2024-01-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2024)
Attorneys
United States Federal Government, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent