Whether being in federal detention, custody is a substantial denial of Ronald Freeman's constitutional right of liberty, without sufficient cause, without compelling reasons for the United States Congress to proscribe marijuana as a dangerous substance, a drug) crime, therefore without due process of law, contravening Amendments IV and V of the Constitution of the United States

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether being in federal “detention,” “custody” is a substantial denial of Ronald Freeman’s constitutional right of liberty, without “sufficient cause,” without compelling reasons for the United States Congress to proscribe marijuana as a dangerous substance, a drug) crime, therefore without due process of law, contravening Amendments IV and V of the Constitution of the United States. 2. Whether a party inpriapoed under a sentence of a United States court, upon conviction of a crime created by and indictable under an unconstitutional act of Congress, should be discharged dom imprisonment by this court on habeas corpus. | | | | | | | | | PARTY TO THE PROCEEDING Ronald Freeman is in the custody of: Warden Ray FCI Hazelton P.O. Box 460 Bruceton Mills, WV 26525 ; RELEVANT CASES United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee United States of America v. Ronald Freeman 2:20-cr-20169-SHL-1 Judgment entered 7/29/21 Ronald Freeman v. United States of America 2:21-cv-02656-SHL-1 Judgment entered 12/05/2022