No. 23-6544
IFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction criminal-procedure due-process emotional-harm enhancement-factor miscarriage-of-justice prejudicial-variance sentencing-guidelines third-party-harm
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Minnesota sentencing guidelines enhancement factor particular cruelty in relying on emotional harm to third parties instead of conduct exacted on the victim by the accused, trigger a miscarriage of justice through a prejudicially fatal variance?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. DOES THE MINNESOTA SENTENCING GUIDELINES ENHANCEMENT FACTOR PARTICULAR CRUELTY IN RELYING ON EMOTIONAL HARM TO THIRD PARTIES INSTEAD OF CONDUCT EXACTED ON THE VICTIM BY THE ACCUSED, TRIGGER A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE THROUGH A PREJUDICIALLY FATAL VARIANCE? Hicks: 201228
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-12-19
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Mo Savoy Hicks
Mo Savoy Hicks — Petitioner