No. 23-6546

Paul R. Hansmeier v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus rule-of-lenity sentencing statutory-interpretation supreme-court-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-02-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an indictment that affirmatively alleges a course of conduct outside the scope of the charged offense can be the basis for a conviction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : __ QUE ste nS pResce = D ; Queshon 14 ee _ his Counts dec ois in ottu: . duited Sates 535 Ls. 625, 52. EA 2d 860122 pps (2002) established that not all_indictnent Iintecprelwhon of Cotton. The split is over He issue_of whaler an chnent thak afErmabucly alongs 0 course of Conduct oulside the Scope __ g sueshon presen keds by thks petihon is: _— Hindi ment lleges Only a non-offense or te accept a plen te conduct fede [ Mail oy ute rad tatutes have. VE hustoncally ly been ap spolial | , _ IST oF PARTIES _ hin Pedohon : ; u : _ | 7 spouse comeing ! a : TION) COR WRT : CE enone | | 1 ho veal WY) _ _ | : 1 , Bs ona | 8 ; _ T LEVANT sryTUToR PRavisialy 3. : . 3 , | _ l ASONS FoR. “RAMMING THE perme _10 | | TABLE 2 AU ees _ a Teil ve Ute) Stobeg L435, ce wot (2023) hin K m4 Ap _ ne _ _ | BBY F.3d 98 (2d Lin 2018) _% 13/15, le —_ i tke States v. Camek __ 13 | 46 F.3d 1206 (low Gr 2015) | ; | Hi laates Stade sv. De Vi n : Uo __ 694 F.3d IN fey Zaz) Lo 63d ae (Wk Ge 201) _ | 297 £33 lax (ith Ce 2002) _ | — TABLE oF Autor NES _— _ Wnvted Stites u Belen, 30 63d Jog _ . r We OS. 2602) (per Curiam) : _ 07 £3) 335 (UK Cin Zoig) | | : Usd § 424) _ _ | 4 A We A tole) _ 6. _. Bae Sas) | _ _—_.. _ Respun AN . . _ . _. RENTION FOR WRIT OF Ceaneanal : : _ | _ _ Pi IO weLow | , rs | __ The Gunton helaw ts uunpublis le ‘) and 1s_teprh din tla Append .s | Tis Pohhons — 4... — — _ : 023. Hence, this Retrhen is timely. This Court has panadlich an_tp reins the | | ~ : _ / RELE VAUT STATUTORY PROUIS obs — — | Tis peti nudlues the coiminal asdichan of He distil cots the sth + caurts of the [avted Stotes shal! owe. origina {pasdichon OKC Lesiue. _ i the warts (N“The, 5t2 2 of \\_ offenses _4 ainst elas of Ho United States, athing tn ths site shall be held 4p take usa or mp oe paddies of He UNS Ot The. Seve | States: under the. Lasals (hMeves _ : : Usd ban cases ohh, te alegabts AN Ho ind ict ane or extablaled : tle sxe ot the. cha ne Schl. Foc example “ths ( uct te cently ejected _ | — Wate Stak | w_,_lA3 5a Noy 21s L624 ei fina) iadould a. United ! s_dishnct_couuct bas alienate piss ome an achon nak — = , ee | a wad stalute! sant exanply this Cnc held thet attenphed , ua S.Ch Dont 215.1 63 24 344 (2002). lad Unto Ses — ipa a eld hap gully fuse a Frat fice bs Nsked lt He change of plea hearing aceHek the undedying cone ct | Uidlence wuss GHtonpted Hobbs Ack cabbey? | The Gress Couts disqoee dai the ansner His mpadact press — _ i revs Caw fe: specifically address He swe. has rejected otters to pol, i Federal Froud stalubes tr alleqahars of Niheaten Conduck, Thesecourts | pecvand that allawing “such Heones would impermssrb ly_undecnure te : funchon of He courts by savitia rebaliatory frand clans, dessrna fish in yudiesal proreedigs tnd seure, chung access fe He Courts, The . lowe couct ignored He stack tnrnigs of He Bint, See, FAK, howd — _|[Tewth and Eleventr Greats (ard even 13 Caer panel dexivits ) iN pFhiming tHe ylgnent of. conichin and Hon denying acechfeste of | poesia on He ive Robibiwes 28 UIC 3 2256 __ past The lids ahi sa tou be bncal hx ii al Pebincner wes _dewen — Tpharmed Peter Ls Fiaud_ofenses shenaning fina inet Copyaght — a — Fos Vigan ies. Ihe Fin jit gaten shabay meled : TG by io disclos nitenal fits _in his discovery applicaors to te courts, — pa = 1030 fie pursu igen. Teinfonges aches his — aukhonrabon and sbtauned rformabion as a pesult in Uidlabion of [¥ | __ HSC § tte (OVPTE). The ett leg a te hm ; J | sper Fraud nd Abuse het isere Fiuslans And theese Rouse ———accalig tte indict, Froese ote clas ele lain |S. Rebthiner moved dismiss th idicine Ta his maton tp ; isms, Pebrtioner sc wed tha t allegations of hii gadvan miscand 7" Ell ; ach a amma tt eno Lain | fsscanact fall edd th sop of Ho Fedral mail—wite Bem Phe Pine oe tale a condoned plea that lead him TIF inc Cling HO Gang aaa oF id Patina re _ Nythout Spect ficalli addres sig a | nee — ie ssserted fs ixqunctt. The distinct domed j The aaa ted

Docket Entries

2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-02-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2024)

Attorneys

Paul Hansmeier
Paul Hansmeier — Petitioner
Paul Hansmeier — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent