No. 23-6549
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment motion-to-withdraw penson-v-ohio right-to-counsel standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when the United States Court of Appeals granted counsel's motion for leave to withdraw, which completely denied the petitioner counsel on appeal
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED FOR REVIEW WHETHER THE PETITOINERS FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS WERE VICLATED, WHEN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS GRANTED COUNSEL'S MOTION -FOR LEAVE TO WITEDRAW, WHICH COMPLETELY DENIED TRE PETITIONER COUNSEL ON APPEAL. (Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 102 L.Ed 2d. 300, 109 S.ct 346 (1988))
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent