No. 23-6549
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment motion-to-withdraw penson-v-ohio right-to-counsel standing
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE PETJTOINERS FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED,
WHEN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS GRANTED COUNSEL'S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW, WHICH COMPLETELY DENIED THE PETITIONER
COUNSEL ON APPEAL.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when the United States Court of Appeals granted counsel's motion for leave to withdraw, which completely denied the petitioner counsel on appeal
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2024)
Attorneys
Delon Scott
Delon Scott — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent