No. 23-6557
Frank R. Stevenson v. Lynn Lilley, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: automatic-reversal constitutional-rights criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process federal-law ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment structural-error unwanted-defense
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the unconstitutionality of imposing an unwanted defense on the accused, over objection, has long been federally established and is a structural error requiring automatic reversal
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the unconstitutionality of imposing an unwanted defense on the accused, over objection, : has long been federally established and is a structural error requiring automatic reversal. . @ @
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent Lynn Lilley to respond filed.
2024-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 23, 2024)
Attorneys
Lynn Lilley
Leonard Joblove — Kings County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Leonard Joblove — Kings County District Attorney's Office, Respondent