No. 23-6567

Jonathan David Wilke v. Wisconsin

Lower Court: Wisconsin
Docketed: 2024-01-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process forfeiture harmless-error lineup photo-array witness-identification
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-02-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision an erroneous application of law?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . 1. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that Jonathan forfeited his argument. about Detective ° Dolan's and T.J.'s testimony about Tis reaction to Jonathan's photo during a photo array. . . Was the Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision an erroneous application of law? , ‘ 2. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that Jonathan's constitutional right to have his : : . attorney present at a live lineup was violated. But this violation was harmless error. Was this © violation harmless error? . ; 3. Should social science be considered during the harmless error analysis in witness ; ; identification cases? : : , . |

Docket Entries

2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-02-02
Waiver of right of respondent Wisconsin to respond filed.
2023-12-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 26, 2024)

Attorneys

Jonathan Wilke
Jonathan David Wilke — Petitioner
Wisconsin
Sonya Knecht BiceWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent