Is the State continuing failure to follow federal statutes, regulations, policies and practices impacting state court originated federal criminal justice records an appropriate public impacting issue to justify a timely Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) motion and a timely petition for certiorari

QUESTIONS PRESENTED i. Is the State continuing failure to follow. (even after specifically passing a state law expressly agreeing io adhere to applicable federal law, etc.. and highlighting privacy concerns of individuals), federal statutes, regulations, policies and practices impacting state court originated federal criminal justice records relied upon by the federal government. state governments. the public. etc. for background checks. including firearm transfers an appropriate public impacting issue to both justify a timely Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) motion and a timely petition for certiorari. in-order to address and correct the continuing State failure before further harm is inflicted? 2. Does fraud on the court. in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (7 Stat. 13. 1871) supervisory liability case, also apply to the constructive knowledge context of the supervisor, especially when 17 Stat. 13 clearly directs no state immunities or defenses are allowed, (effectively requiring strict liability against state court agents, after duc process notice is mei as applicable)? 3. isthe Fifth Amendment double jeopardy protection against multiple punishments a Constitutional jurisdictional issue mandating every court specifically analyze the claim; and if multiple punishments for one offense are evident (and noi ignored), a failure to end the continuing Constitutiunal violation yesuits in a void, for want of Constitutional jurisdiction, judgment. redressable in any court. ai any time?