No. 23-6575
Racardo Jackson v. Ken Clark, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment impeachment miranda-warnings selective-silence self-incrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-02-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a suspect's 'selective silence' after receiving Miranda warnings may be used by the state to establish guilt at trial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: 1) Whether, once a suspect has been taken into custody and given the Miranda warning, the suspect's "selective silence"that is, the refusal to answer some but not other questions may be used by the State to establish the suspect's guilt at trial. Petitioner Racardo Jackson respectfully petitions for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in this case. i
Docket Entries
2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-02-06
Waiver of right of respondent Ken Clark, Warden to respond filed.
2024-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 26, 2024)
Attorneys
Ken Clark, Warden
Gregory A. Ott — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Gregory A. Ott — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Racardo Jackson
Michael Bradley Bigelow — Law Office, Petitioner
Michael Bradley Bigelow — Law Office, Petitioner