No. 23-658
Medical Transportation Management, Inc. v. Isaac Harris, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split civil-procedure class-certification commonality federal-rules-of-civil-procedure policy-uniformity rule-23 significant-proof uniform-policy
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Where class certification is based on allegations that a defendant's policy or practice has injured class members, what constitutes "significant proof" that such policy or practice applies uniformly to all members of the class as required to establish commonality under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(2)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Where class certification is based on allegations that a defendant's policy or practice has injured class members, what constitutes 'significant proof' that such policy or practice applies uniformly to all members of the class as required to establish commonality under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(2)?
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-03
Waiver of right of respondents Isaac Harris, et al. to respond filed.
2023-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 18, 2024)
2023-10-12
Application (23A322) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 15, 2023.
2023-10-06
Application (23A322) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 16, 2023 to December 15, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Isaac Harris, et al.
Michael Terence Kirkpatrick — Public Citizen Litigation Group, Respondent
Medical Transportation Management, Inc.
Jean-Claude Andre — Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, Petitioner