Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it refused to apply the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 to Kenneth Roshaun Qedens

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \ ssuE*s +0 +he Supreme Court Justices Did he Disnet Court Abuse its discretion, and commit Plain Ere” When it resell to Apply the Fair Sentenc thy Acctof 2010 Crack Law to Kenneth Roshaun Qe ds nah 4-2603 on Remand aftethe YCyou'+ Court of Appeals Vacated. andi hemarded i+ for fesertenciag and tn them +e reconsider, Artiche Wk Cousts must apply the laud y Cumment law ), corde by thee Lous Wen applicable to a defendant. I+ 1s rot a ophenal chase +. Not Ayply the laws J especially a retwacve law . Vo, K ‘ \ % Didsme Disa (our Blase Us discash when She cast 9-79R sas ate A ae ly ot giving Appellant Kenneth Zerch Kant ww Allocute undler Rule 3Q, and refisiry te give tm the Oprertws 5 be hear iw mitgating eudancs Hepaicinsr of Cancel . a Caprta ute i's entt Hed +o tment OF Cause Rule ws eboen Plein Uda peor Se eetea2) ul ° ‘ . ef 4 Diddhe Distnet Court hse. cts Aiscrettn by not even giving Mr. eth a resentencing hearing alter Case] 4-7603 uses Vacated and emarbel. Ne was'rcteven braylt back to Cart af all ‘ic . its discrettn by refusing ty fli +o-follas the USSG Dict or Tas otal Se ect appropnite Semencer Er @ deRndant SRA Sentencin nes Act vidletins\ Unitedstaks 1 Ga {| «Cans the den qurty TwelletClorent nde Hensel Metend of the z