Does the lower court's decision to allow the government to supplement the record mid-appeal demonstrate a misapplication of statutory canons and affect the petitioner's due process rights?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Questions Presented are: 1. The lower court endorsed the Government’s supplementation of the “record” with new documents mid-appeal. Does the lower Court’s decision, which demonstrates a misapplication of the canons of statutory affecting Petitioner’s Due Process rights—and highlights a difference in federal appellate practice regarding the addition of new materials to the “record” on appeal, necessitate this Court’s intervention? 2. Can a federal prosecutor of child sex crimes cases also serve as a military judge in a child sex crime case without an appearance of partiality?