Whether the district attorney's striking of the only Black juror in the petitioner's trial violated the petitioner's constitutional rights

No question identified. : () On Van necy |, 2022 51385(8) ome veesewre © , UNGer & Sing le case qumber ue effect Tues gilte 3 striky AT WHS Hivtn 5 Ki yoan Tr Lappy Owen B like Start entry £o | Udiacrout GK WweaPda t5 thi ~ pens cobe DLL oboe) e eata ‘3 his Considered Pair 4 . BYE wos MoT Heyes atac trial by San oF m peers AS bq RII chin Rmerid da man because the Disteict \ torndy in my contre [ling case Struck the only black juror Whose backround ae pertecily Ts her Wdidas fare for should be granted atin rial of my race l } , UY) Lass aranted mental health diversion Duct when 4s bea te KY pear L Said yes had my +cin\ yabie made a yadaeme® with or me the Aste ck ator ny AO mM rial aForney den ying my mngtion for met Al health cversid by ream On appee i was granted the apgortunity as wetile: against he wise " my trtal bud new Tam QMS agneast him Agen i bias whs pyectucn Loan ap ine 1 Reont ot mtn may n 5) do Lagply for “Racial Jussiee Ket" 4 | | | (-[-24