Does the state of Ohio have the ability to stop access to the court by using the Vexatious Litigator OH, Rev, cod, § 2323.52 or does the First amendment protect the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances, which is found in the first Amendment?

No question identified. : @ @ 1 QUESTION: Does the state of Ohio have the ability to stop access to the court by using the Vexatious Litigator OH, Rev, cod, § 2323.52 or does the First amendment protect the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances, which is found in the first Amendment? 2 QUESTION: Is the Ohio The law of Vexatious Litigation F(1) of § 2323.52 “overbreadth” and “vagueness ” in the application of the right to satisfy the right to move a case followed as a Vexatious Litigator? 3 QUESTION: Does the state of Ohio have the ability to dictate legal education that pertaining to out side the state of Ohio and discourages religious pilgrimage and doctrines of Scientology when engaging in the Ohio’s courts? 4 QUESTION: Does the regulation! must be a reasonable time pace, or manner restriction that leaves open adequate alternative place for speech? 5 QUESTION: Does the Petitioner have the right to a not to associate for fees and JD requirements under the Ohio Admission the Bar of Ohio over this issues? 6 QUESTION: Does these violations by the Ohio Supreme court justify a Havard bachelor degree, Yale law degree law degree and Ohio law license for the Petitioner? 1 Vexatious Litigation F(1) of § 2323.52 Page 2 of 15 Case Ellis v. Railway Clerks, 466 U. S. 435 (1984). 2.0... 0.0 cc cece eee ece et tett