No. 23-6611

Morice Ervin v. Indiana

Lower Court: Indiana
Docketed: 2024-01-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process expert-testimony expert-witness-testimony fair-trial favorable-evidence fourteenth-amendment lack-of-evidence post-autopsy prejudicial-questioning
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-petitioner's-due-process-rights-were-violated

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether petitioner's Due process — 14" Amendment of the Federal Constitution was. violated by allowing post autopsy? 2. Whether petitioner’s Due process of the Federal Constitution violated when evidence so lack of correlating evidence? 3. Whether petitioner’s Due process of the Federal Constitution was violated when the ; state deliberately misquoted the professional expert witness testimony to obtain/ a tainted conviction? 4. Whether petitioner’s Due Process constitutional rights violated when the state fail to : provide evidence favorable to petitioner? 7 5. Whether petitioner’s Fifth Amendment constitutional rights violated when he was subject to the same offense? _ 6. Whether petitioner’s Federal Constitutional rights violated when state discriminated against petitioner by prejudicial questioning? —~ 7. Whether there is the likelihood that the jury has applied the challenge instruction in a way that violates the Federal Constitution Due Process Clause Right to a fair Trial? 8. Were petitioner constitutional rights violated when trial judge showed indifference to ongoing conflict with petitioner and appointed counsel? 9. Whether the counsel’s unprofessional errors upset the adversarial balance violates the Federal Constitution — Right to Counsel?

Docket Entries

2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-20
Waiver of right of respondent Indiana to respond filed.
2024-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 29, 2024)

Attorneys

Indiana
James Allen BartaOffice of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent
James Allen BartaOffice of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent
Morice Ervin
Morice Ervin — Petitioner
Morice Ervin — Petitioner