Did the NCCOA and NCSC improperly deny appellant's motions or was it a violation of appellate rules and of national interest to court litigation and citizens of North Carolina?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1: Did the NCCOA and NCSC Improperly Deny Appellant’s Motions for R. 33 Notice of Representation or was violation of the appellate rules and is of National Interests to Court Litigation and to the Citizens of North Carolina 2: Did the NCCOA and NCSC Improperly Deny Appellant’s R. 38 Motion for Party Substitution or was violation of the appellate rules and is of National Interests to Court Litigation and to the Citizens of North Carolina 3. Did the NCCOA and NCSC — Improperly Deny Appellant’s Motion for or was violation of the appellate rules and is of National Interests to Court Litigation and to the Citizens of North Carolina 4: Did the NCCOA and NCSC — Improperly Grant Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Without Providing an Analysis or Opinion or Determine the Merits or Material Facts and Violates at Least the 14th Amendment Due process, and U.S. Code. 1983 and is of National Interests to Court Litigation and to the Citizens of North Carolina 4A: Did the NCCOA and NCSC Commit Reversible Error in the Dismissal as a U.S. Code. 1983 Violation (But Appellant also Reserves This Violation as a Separate Federal 1983 Claim) and Wasn’t NCCOA’s Conduct a violation of at least N.C. Constitution Article 1 Sec. #1, 18, 19, and 25 and is of National Interests to : Court Litigation and to the Citizens of North Carolina 5: Did the NCCOA and NCSC’s Orders Violate Constitutional Rights and N.C. Appellate Rules in providing no opinions and NCSC do so by N.C. G.S. § 7A30 or § 7A-31 for Affirming or Dissenting Opinions or in providing no opinions and is of National Interests to Court Litigation and to the Citizens of North Carolina , iii PARTIES TO PROCEEDINGS Kathy R. Allen is the Petitioner and filed the WCSC 2020 Caveat for her mother’s N.C. estate and administration of it for its property after her sibling Jay K. Allen filed a 2017 Caveat that was denied January 6, 2020 Order. | Arthur L. Allen [sic deceased] is Respondent ] and Petitioner’s oldest sibling who was the personal collector for their mother’s estate and ‘Will’ but himself passed in late 2020. His wife Mary Flager Allen is supposedly his estate’s personal collector, but failed to appear or be officially represented in any of the cases. Steve R. Allen is Respondent 2 and another of Petitioner’s sibling who was a party to the 2017 Caveat and continued being named as a party into the Petitioner’s 2020 Caveat for their mother’s estate and ‘Will’. : Jay K. Allen is not a party to the cases on this writ but is another of the Petitioner’s sibling who filed the 2017 Caveat on their mother’s estate and ‘Will’. He and the Caveat he filed are discussed in some of the arguments’ discussions and has his own pending appellate options for it. , iv RELATED CASES AND HEARINGS Wake County Superior Court (WCSC), Raleigh, North Carolina for the case #16-E01390. Kathy R. Allen v. Arthur L. Allen, [sic] Steve R. Allen, Anthony A. Klish Caveat filed February 13, 2020 Judgment entered by Judge Rozier November 18, 2021 granting Respondents’ motion to dismiss (MTD) . North Carolina Court of Appeals (NCCOA) #22-276 Kathy R. Allen v. Arthur L. Allen, [sic] Steve R. Allen , Anthony A. Klish for its February 7, 2023 and last two Orders dated March 3, 2023 Judgment dismissed the appeal granting Appellees’? MTD North Carolina Supreme Court (NCSC) #84P23 Kathy R. Allen v. Arthur L. Allen, [sic] Steve R. Allen , Anthony A. Klish for its September 57, 2023 Order Judgment denied Appellant’s N.C.G.S. § 7A-30 notice of appeal and N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 discretionary review for the NCCOA #22-276 Order ;