No. 23-6615
Jason James Veal v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924(c)(3)(a) attempted-murder crime-of-violence elements-clause hobbs-act sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation united-states-v-taylor
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether attempted murder with the same elements as attempted Hobbs Act robbery is not a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED After this Court’s decision in United States v. Taylor, 596 U.S. 845 (2022) which held that attempted Hobbs Act robbery is not a crime of violence under the 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) elements/force clause, is attempted murder with the same elements as attempted Hobbs Act robbery also not a crime of violence? i
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 29, 2024)
Attorneys
Jason Veal
Vicki Marolt Buchanan — Vicki Marolt Buchanan, PC, Petitioner
Vicki Marolt Buchanan — Vicki Marolt Buchanan, PC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent