No. 23-6634

Andres Colon-Miranda v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review due-process litigation-strategy package-doctrine sentencing-guidelines summary-dismissal ussg-3d1.2
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Appropriate-standard-of-review

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A. What is the appropriate standard of review when an appellate court improperly grants a motion for summary dismissal that has the practical effect of dismissing an entire cause of action? B. Whether the First Circuit Court of Appeals committed reversible error when it indulged the government's litigation strategy of filing a motion for summary disposition a day before its merits brief was due, violates the due process? Cc. Whether the Court’s granting of Summary Dismissal would amount to an abuse of discretion and miscarriage of justice because this case raised issue(s) of exceptional importance under the “package doctrine” used under the then-mandatory sentencing guidelines pursuant to USSG § 3D1.2? ii

Docket Entries

2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2024)

Attorneys

Andres Colon-Miranda
Andres Colon-Miranda — Petitioner
Andres Colon-Miranda — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent