No. 23-6638

Trent Drexel Howard v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process extradition government-delay governmental-delay incarceration sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-protections speedy-trial speedy-trial-clause
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration Patent
Latest Conference: 2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Ninth Circuit err by failing to treat 'undue and oppressive incarceration' and 'anxiety and concern accompanying public accusation' as the major evils against which the Sixth Amendment's Speedy Trial Clause protects while improperly faulting Petitioner for Inter-Divisional Governmental delay in seeking his extradition from custody in Kazakhstan?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Ninth Circuit err by failing to treat "undue and oppressive incarceration" and "anxiety and concern accompanying public accusation" as the major evils against which the Sixth Amendment's Speedy Trial Clause protects while improperly faulting Petitioner for Inter-Divisional Governmental delay in seeking his extradition from custody in Kazakhstan? : i

Docket Entries

2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2024)
2023-11-16
Application (23A441) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 15, 2023.
2023-10-13
Application (23A441) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 16, 2023 to December 15, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Trent D. Howard
Trent Drexel Howard — Petitioner
Trent Drexel Howard — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent