No. 23-6647

Davaudrick Antron EtchisonBrown v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-02-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment bruen-standard criminal-law criminal-statute due-process federal-jurisdiction firearm-possession interstate-commerce precedent second-amendment sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 142 8. Ct. 2111 (2022). 2. Whether Congress may criminalize intrastate firearm possession based solely on the firearm crossing state lines at some point before the defendant came to possess it. 3. Whether this Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgment below, and remand for the Fifth Circuit to reconsider Amendment 822’s effect on precedent defining the enumerated offense of “robbery” under U.S. SENT’G COMM’N, GUIDELINES MANUAL §4B1.2 (Nov. 2021) (“USSG”). i

Docket Entries

2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-11
Reply of petitioner Davaudrick Antron EtchisonBrown filed.
2024-02-29
Memorandum of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-01-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2024)

Attorneys

Davaudrick EtchisonBrown
Maria Gabriela VegaOffice of the Federal Public Defender, NDTX, Petitioner
Maria Gabriela VegaOffice of the Federal Public Defender, NDTX, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent