Whether the police violated the Fourth Amendment by fingerprinting the petitioner without probable cause or a warrant

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED l —, Mla ly WAT. appanted ATToOlogel. Sf ; ff J top a A # 2 2 I |.diZ2a ThE. MVE: QAT(LE LATE ATA, Yi 1 7 JA « . 2 ie and jinvestieatine LaViS in apen Coup : Withilit bars 2 béine SEL VEr | V4 | J | M0UAWE LAU wNTynatTe]y Beoaated | WNT TRE fp Lia a VLOLE LLNETHL, LE. WGP AWEPIE NAAVANCE 12 HeaAbTepung Y GCL Gnd Wh agate | | VA Rn CT AWIEALANCE A Canspla Question’ fresented y . 2 / by, Y, } , ip Z o Cs ! , 4 A, , 7 ¢ P ad a UbLE delender: SL thethe the etdep te Copel laux to be tingerpnted tide ly the Judgetebruay ot hall tp the La a tf < tex A ? 2, y 2 é wo SIAL: ie / ‘ipl L ? Delta Unit Legal Use Only vl tt ate spiked wbinag tetera la and Laws Cod anpaintld attotnée, _ppedetiwmnéd (n_ advance the aubeane ot a. caute appealance Teudiral preceeding tor the atone, Arkansas polize aticer Me case te capel Lapoy tais te_ger foyerminfed — tnside He Opel Souded Canltfoan in adel fa ftobable causeP on tes rulay 5 at 2019 Liben Hey by assumed pespansi bility fot _having Tavis Tingerprinted in Cate? to. be.inbettpated