No. 23-6652
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aiding-and-abetting carjacking criminal-law criminal-statute due-process evidence-sufficiency federal-statutes intent rosemond-standard rosemond-v-us
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Insufficient-evidence-for-carjacking-conviction
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. The government failed to prove by sufficient evidence as to the petitioner that the possessed the requisite intent to commit the carjacking offense; there was insufficient evidence to satisfy the elements of the Federal Carjacking Statute so as to convict the petitioner as an aider and abettor to the crime of carjacking under 18 U.S.C. § 2119 & 2; the petitioner had no advance knowledge of the carjacking as required under Rosemond v. U.S. 134 S.Ct 1240, (2014). i
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-01
2023-12-18
Application (23A551) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 12, 2024.
2023-12-07
Application (23A551) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 13, 2023 to February 11, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent