Whether the petitioner was denied the right to a revocation hearing under Morrissey v. Brewer and Gagnon v. Scarpelli, and the right to effective assistance of counsel at the revocation hearing and initial collateral review proceedings, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; “ASS IGNMENT OF ERROR’ Petitioner, Lors denied the righ+ +o A reir Kellogg v. Shoemaker, Wel 3d S04 tevocation hearing Under, Morrissey vu | Brewer 408 US FTI And, Gagnon) 4 US.. TR@, And ‘denied the tiq ht +a “@erechive Assictanice oF Cavnsel At the fevdcAHON hearing And, At the, initialreview Collateral Proceedings, a violation OF the, Sithaad, — fodrteemth (it), amendmen+, OF the LIC. — Conctitation, AH 1 Sc. 1B,0F the Ohio . COnstittian Martinez v, Ryan, 13aS,.Et 301, ‘Respectfolly SdbmHted petra wer | , so .