Whether a state statute that denies a criminal defendant the constitutional right to a speedy trial violates the Equal Protection Clause

No question identified. : bo, | QUESTIONS) FRECENTED | . Wow con a Gioke enack and use an Ack, that by 45 oon Vagu ness, Com tae Werpretated te deny . Any. Criminal defendant the vight te.a spealy triol under the United States Constitutional Seedy Wial Right, all the while , having a very Similar Act that entities criminal defendants Not only the right to a Consiimtional speedy trick, lout also a Statutery. Speedy Trial , therefore, Vielabag « criminal deXerdants Tights fo both O Constitutional Spredy Teal and a Sourteenth amendment Tight of the Equal profection clause oF the United States Coasttuboa Ke How Con he Bate use a Gabe constructed Statute C Rage Sinield Gtatute) te deny & criminal defendant the Constitutional tignt to gentroat Wis aCQuser lpeconse Vre defendant could not Show the coumt whet the angwers to the UAAS Ked questions woald have been’ IF “the defendant was allowed to properly Contront the complains ny wrmness to Find out the ansuxrs te the Needed questions * | | LiST GF PARTIES X; All parties appear in the caption of the cese on the cover page. [ | AU parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A Hst of all