No. 23-6661
Justin Granier v. Tim Hooper, Warden
Tags: 28-usc-2254(d) circuit-court-split circuit-split due-process federal-review habeas-corpus implied-bias judicial-bias statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-05-30
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal has created a split in the Circuit Courts on this issue of implied-bias
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal has created a split in the Circuit Courts on this issue of implied bias. 2. Whether the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal erred in their decision that implied bias has never been determined by the United States Supreme Court. 3. Do the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) exclusively preclude the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal from making an implied bias determination? 2
Docket Entries
2024-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2024-05-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
2024-05-07
Reply of petitioner Justin Granier filed. (Distributed)
2024-04-24
Brief of respondent Tim Hooper, Warden in opposition filed.
2024-04-01
Response Requested. (Due May 1, 2024)
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2023-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2024)
Attorneys
Justin Granier
Donald B. Verrilli Jr. — Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Petitioner
Tim Hooper, Warden
Donald David Candell — 23rd Judicial District Attorney, Respondent