Whether the petitioner was denied due process and a fair trial due to bias, prejudice, and ineffective assistance of counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; | Bsed 60 all fods and A metct pectatans Ay Hats PotAton on +neFeuce of the recond. , will prove beyond aq. shales ot doubt of tn? bias , Pre) vAice ant the Died COrthed “4 to Pedlting pe here tre Pro $e Aebendaat heably 433045 to the United States SOP eme Court to Grant this Petdaon, Hecarse tes Sat Actendast tc siting un Prisan Fos 2 1S Pec for c murder he cdidt Cormmctt, Someone else @ritercd the 0 . r y mo el coom Wn Sate dete ndaxt le { bv the Public Detendee, © 44cut of tr 7h Sin decal <lreut tack te shoo thy Pro S¢ oF Lrnchark ard ertisep tv addess tre trial Courts of thee tot. ose. afoakesh hovebly Csks te Untted 5 fetes Sopron Gunts 4. loolt into this Ard see thy blctert Corre ption of Lhe Cahol? Coredy Gudters | sy stern « The on Nvnal Te A medic.l CXaqnrwer's Wing Pn ng ar 55 atu Ais nae aye ‘echica] ExovIC p53 QR Jaco s tah-hor iz “sen é Phone # 950-12 Boo . And The Mor he Meul4blopt tifias my Case, PMene Lelenor to Vlves Setd Cas@, This fro Se Aetojplas charges Cseinsp Me Cae” Court fF t Pel hurl 45k the nite state rvpremt AN™ TD Start Ars on on al) Facts ard pacers 4 lone | 7 Thank you | | : Sincer!y Lobert E VnA Geo