No. 23-6667

Michael Townsend v. Deondre Esters, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-02-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law court-proceedings due-process insurance-liability judicial-misconduct jurisdiction legal-rights standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the tribunal court follow the constitutions, statues and/or common law upon request given by the Plaintiff to a jury trial (Due Process)?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) Did the tribunal court follow the constitutions, statues and/or common law upon request given by the Plaintiff to a jury trial (Due Process)? Plaintiff: No Defendents: Yes 2.) Did the tribunal courth have Horace Mann pay all medical bills relating to auto accident prior to August 31,2021? Plaintiff: Partially Yes Defendents: Yes 3.) Did the tribunal court enforce DMCare Express, INC. A Michigan Corporation to provide the Plaintiff a copy of their liability insurance upon request? Plaintiff: No Defendants: No response 4.) Did the tribunal court try to coerce the Plaintiff to settle the lawsuit with Katherine Kuttkofsky on a three-way call on March 3, 2021? Plaintiff: Yes Defendants: Would say | settled. 5.) Did the tribunal court tried to mislead and enforce the Plaintiff with Elizabeta Rumery by falsify his rights to continunious treatment and surgeries? Plaintiff: Yes Judge: Yes, that's normal practice and he settled. Elizabeta Rumery: Yes, that's normal practice and he settled. 6.) Did the tribunal force the Plaintiff to obtain an attorney for this case? Plaintiff: Yes, on a Zoom call with many other attorneys. Judge: Yes, on a Zoom cail with many other attorneys. 7.) Did the tribunal court allow the Plaintiff to be heard whenever we spoke? Plaintiff: No, whenever opportunties were there the judge would say she needed to say then hang-up really quick or intervene (Zoom Call). Judge: Yes,she gave me opportunity to speak. 8.) Did the tribunal court judge act as an defense attorney (tresspasser)? Plaintiff: Yes Judge: No

Docket Entries

2024-05-22
Case considered closed.
2024-04-15
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 6, 2024, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 6, 2024)

Attorneys

Michael Townsend
Michael Townsend — Petitioner
Michael Townsend — Petitioner