No. 23-6672
Christopher R. Williams, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court drug-purity drug-quantity methamphetamine-case procedural-errors sentencing-enhancements sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-district-court-erred-by-sentencing-the-defendant
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether the district court erred by sentencing the Defendant to three hundred sixty (360) months in light of the circumstances of the case? IL. Whether the government met its burden to prove the enhancements without producing a firearm and only one piece of objective evidence? Il. Was the government required to provide additional evidence regarding purity? -ii
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-28
Attorneys
Christopher Williams
Bart Edward Beals — Beals Law Firm, LLC, Petitioner
Bart Edward Beals — Beals Law Firm, LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent