No. 23-6674
Terry Eugene Hambrick v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure judicial-discretion judicial-proceedings plain-error plain-error-review standard-of-review standards-of-review supervisory-power
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court has departed from the accepted course of judicial proceedings in expanding the criteria for plain error review on appeal
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented for Review WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT, IN EXPANDING THE CRITERIA REQUIRED BY PLAIN ERROR REVIEW ON APPEAL, HAS SO FAR DEPARTED FROM THE ACCEPTED AND USUAL COURSE OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AS TO CALL FOR AN EXERCISE OF THIS COURT’S SUPERVISORY POWER? i
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-11-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 7, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent