Whether the criminal court and law enforcement's failure to arrest and properly process the accused prevented due process and allowed for misrepresentation of facts and evidence

No question identified. : | : . : DocketNo. SCOTUS : . Writ of Mandamus : : T.L. Wagoner, Pro Se a oe CONSTITUTUIONAL QUESTION ACF. 1660694 nn ‘On October 30, 2012, a key witness to advocate for the People, as a veteran , ©. ‘pediatric:medical specialist on child sexual abuse determined, under peer review, from . oo multiple magnified images of hymen which by demonstration concluded that the thick+, ; ring of redundant tissue to the tip of the hymen was a normal finding in the twelve-yearold adolescent. She explained by contrast that a thin-ring would demonstrate multiple : . acts of sexual abuse or multiple acts of sexual intercourse. . , . On February 5, 2015, the advocate of the People made a discretionary decision to file multiple counts of sexual intercourse (rape) and multiple counts of sexual conduct related offenses against multiple defendants; with respect to the ; finding on the twelve-year-old. Are the elements of the crimes charged justified by the facts presented in the above-stated evidence? . If prosecutorial discretion constitutes the ability to make decisions on whoin to ; charge, with what crime and how severely to punish, what form of legal standard would justify these charges? coy : | | ; : ; yO . . . . ft . 1 . y