Question not identified

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . A. Did the U.S. distriek Court Contravene the requirement of 28 US.¢.52354 tb) and (dd ° A. When a State Prisoner Tailed fo use In available state remedy 1.0.44 | Procedure for roperly briefing issues on Appeal-but +he State appertate Court, Nevertheless Considered ww ineffetve assistance of Counsel issue on He merits , is the U.S. district Court Foreclosed from asserting the doctrine of Procedural default in a federal haleeas Pro curding | B. Assuming hat He state appellate Courd' action Precludes the US. districk Court from Asserting the doctrine of Procedural default in the federal habeas Proceedings » may We Palibioner Submit the findings of the state appellate Court and assert the Presumption of Carreckness Roh 2A us.C, $3254 (d) gives +o factual Findings by @ State trial eourt? C. TE the presumption of Correctness ches act atkompan the state APfeilate cours factual Pindings, is the Petitioner at least en ita to Iigate he. fairness of the evident ara cuidentany hearing becduse he woas Pre ‘ously denied a hearing by the U.S. district Courts Pehieal decison +o chismiss His matter as ime “Barved q 2. Did the Us. district Court apply erraneous standard in evaluating Pelitioner'# Clr of Acual innocence to overcome the me bar under the Ankterrorism and Effective Death Penalty fet of 499— \AEDPA"), 28 S.c.g 2244 1d) 1 A. Did the Petitioner establish by Convinting evidence thar the Factual determination hy the State Court ws erroneous and Herefire is entitled to the Actual ianntence EXCepioN to the AEDPA Statute of limitations 7 B. Does the hun items of nes evidence, Counts as new evidence under Schlu? and Serves to refule, via Clear and Convincing evidence ? . C. Does the Presumption af Correctness applied to State Court faetfindin Standard apply to issues not decided on the merits by the state Court hs an Ugplicalion 492 gateway innocence Assertion } | ui