In a proceeding timely filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255(f)(3), does Attempted Bank Robbery qualify as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. 924(c)'s residual clause or elements clause construed with this Court's precedent in Taylor and Davis in order for 924(c) and the Armed Career Criminal Statute to be applicable?

No question identified. : QUESTION TO BE REVIEWED . Question 1: In a proceeding timely filed under 28 U.S,C. 2255(£)(3) ~ does Attempted Bank Robbery qualify as a crime of violence under 3. 924(c)'s residual clause or elements clause construed with this <3 courts precedent in Taylor and Davis in order for 924(c) and the Armed Career Criminal Statute to be applicable? ; (2) Dees Attempted Bank Mobbery alwuy's require ve oment to Prove beyond 0 reasonabhe bv x ne AS aN element the Use, AHempted Use Mtatened USe of force? . 3 Doe C > . ARempted Bank Nobher Serue 1 a \ ) Y We as Qa “Gry Violence Os +he Insta me of thas U's decision is ced yo ly dtake Po act ue LN Ofer Lop the lower ourts to Cady H+ BS Such 2? (S)_Did the Disteick Wort Comma cor by instructing the Sory that Attemated Bank Bbbery 7 Crime of Wolencte ? Page i PARTIES JUDGMENT TO BE REVIEWED Distrigt Codft judge CLAIRE V. EAGAN, and Appeals Court judge es MATHESON, BACHARACH, and ROSSMAN‘are the judges who's judgment is to be reviewed.