No. 23-6687
Darius James Francis v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment bruen-standard criminal-law criminal-statute due-process federal-jurisdiction firearm-possession interstate-commerce second-amendment standing
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 142 8S. Ct. 2111 (2022). 2. Whether Congress may criminalize intrastate possession of a firearm or ammunition solely because the firearm or ammunition crossed state lines at some point before the defendant came to possess it. il
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Darius Francis
Michael Lance Herman — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Michael Lance Herman — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent