No. 23-6690
Lamark Armond Combs, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a district court expand the record on remand to allow the government to present additional evidence even though the government's burden was clear at the initial sentencing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented For Review L May a district court expand the record on remand to allow the government to present additional evidence even though the government’s burden was clear at the initial sentencing? I. Should the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for non-production child pornography offenses be entitled to a presumption of reasonableness? 1
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Lamark Combs
Alfredo G. Parrish — Parrish Kruidenier L.L.P., Petitioner
Alfredo G. Parrish — Parrish Kruidenier L.L.P., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent