Michael T. Braxton v. Warden, Anderson County Detention Center
DueProcess
Did the State of South Carolina deny the Petitioner a Substantial Constitutional right to a 'Constitutionally Adequate' probable-cause determination?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Did the State of South Carolina deny the Petitioner a Substantial Constitutional right to a “Constitutionally Adequate” ,[ PROBABLE CAUSE] determination ? 2. Does REPETITIVE “State Court Abuse” make the Exceptions under the Younger Abstention doctrine applicable to the Petitioner ? 3. Is the Petitioner positioned under a “State Corrective Process” that’s Inapplicable to him ? 4. Was the Petitioner’s Due Process MOOTED Before and After a trial being conducted in the absence of a “Constitutionally Adequate” [PROBABLE CAUSE] determination. 5. Did the State Court’s of South Carolina lack jurisdiction over Subject Matter of the petition, due to the violation of the MANDATORY Statutory requisite time period AFTER the [ PROBABLE CAUSE] determination. 6. Is the State of South Carolina violating the Petitioner’s Civil Rights by detaining him in violation of the Laws and Treaties of the United States. (2253) (c)(2)