No. 23-6697
Jorge Hernandez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure court-reasoning discretion due-process judicial-discretion mandate mandate-recall motion-denial procedural-due-process reasoning
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the appellate court abuse its discretion by failing to provide any reasoning to permit meaningful appellate review?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED In order to permit meaningful appellate review of whether a court properly exercised its discretion, a court must provide at least a brief statement of . Yeasons with its order. The appellate court summarily denied Jorge Hernandez's motion to recall the mandate, “providing no reasoning. Did the appeilate court abuse its discretion by failing to provide any reasoning to permit meaningful appellate review? . ' i
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 8, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent