No. 23-6699

In Re Derlon Crain

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-02-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-review standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why the Western Disk 2 aid sor lose Dunes of Dist Cent sy makin o De Neva Aeteamisatio's pe these. Potters pe ePoat to which pbblechors Was made?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ©, Why the Weste2o Disk 2 aid sor lose Dunes of” Dist Cent sy makin oO De Neva Aeteamisatio’s pe these. Potters pe ePoat to which pbblechors Was made ? &). WhY came said Court did ser herer Rule <a) id ReDueshist a Qulisd oS MetfeS to Reconsider, aShesens, Pettrone2 is extith to A Audicial eviews S46¢8 102 $y1.61 2

Docket Entries

2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2023-12-22
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2024)

Attorneys

Crain, In Re Derlon
Derlon Crain — Petitioner
Derlon Crain — Petitioner